| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Austen's Lady Susan, Mores, Manners - Fashioning Society

Page history last edited by Abigail Heiniger 10 years, 6 months ago

Return to Heiniger, Abigail

 

Agenda:


 


Fashioning and Society

 

Jane Austen's Lady Susan (1794, 1871) is one of Austen's early, unpublished works. This novel negotiates ideas about the role and power women have in society. Austen's treatment of infidelity in this text is dramatically different than that of her later works.

  • How does her freedom here reflect ideas circulating in the works of other Romantic writers?
    • Thinking forward - consider the works of Shelley and Byron? How do they treat infidelity? Austen was particularly aware of her literary context. She specifically references Byron in later novels (i.e. Northanger Abbey). In later works, Byron and the Romantics function as a foil for the ideal heroine. Is that how they function here?  
  • How does it differ from later nineteenth-century fiction (particularly the domestic novel)?
  • How does it anticipate later nineteenth-century fiction? 

 

The Epistolary Novel: The Rise of Prose Fiction and "Scribbling Women"

  • The epistolary novel was particularly popular in the later eighteenth and early nineteenth  century (Samuel Richardson's Pamela; or, Virtue Rewarded (1740) being an extremely popular example). 
    • How does the epistle function as a transition for prose? 
  • The epistolary novel ushered in an era of prose fiction. This revolution in genre coincides with the rise of women writers across the transatlantic world (Virginia Woolf quite famously draws a connection between these two things).
    • What connections do you see between women's writing and letter writing in this text specifically?    
    • How does this epistolary novel construct female voice (and female agency through writing)?
    • How does lettering writing compare with direct address in this text (how is it gendered)?  


Mores and Manners: The Rise of Middle Class Morality

  • Austen's Lady Susan negotiates the difference between morality and manners. It might be argued that the distinction between manners and morality highlights the concerns of the growing middle class at the beginning of the nineteenth century. Even as the middle class embraced fashions previous reserved for aristocracy, it sought to distinguish itself from the excesses and immorality associated with the aristocracy (in the cultural imagination) by emphasizing morality.  
    • The coquette and the art of flirtation are particularly associated with the aristocracy and court culture. Novels, such as Richardson's Pamela, cemented these associations. How does Austen's Lady Susan contribute to this social construction of the aristocracy? 
    • How does domesticity overcome the excesses of the coquette? How does this contribute to the cultural belief in (acceptance of) the growing power of the middle class?    

 

Eighteenth-Century: French Court Fashion

 

Court Dress 1780s (France) 

This was worn in the court of Louis XVI of France (the monarch beheaded in the French Revolution). 

 

The pageantry of the court is connected with the coquetry in Lady Susan. Queen Elizabeth I established courtship (and flirtation) as a part of the politics of the royal court and that idea remained an important part of the cultural imagination into the nineteenth century.

  


Fashioning Gender Identity in Eighteenth-Century Clothing

 

Can you tell which of these details is for a woman's outfit and which is for a man? 

 

 

 

Men's and Women's Suits ca 1780-1790

 

As the fashions of the aristocratic elite were adopted by the emerging middle class, their inherent gender ambiguity was criticized. Periodicals (such as The Tatler and The Spectator) helped transform aristocratic fashions for the increasingly polarized social spheres of men and women. Men's clothing became increasingly austere and functional while women's fashions continued to function as status symbols and embrace the extravagance that characterized eighteenth-century aristocratic clothing.  

  • For more background on this, consider this excerpt:  Addison Background.pdf
  • How is Lady Susan participating in the emerging gender constructions and concerns of the nineteenth century? How is fashion particularly implicated in this social construction? 

 


 

The 1790s: Revolution in Fashion

 

During the 1790s and the first decades of the 1800s, women's fashions changed dramatically. 

 

 

Woman's Day Gown ca. 1800

 

The simple, high-waisted shifts of worn from 1790 - 1810 resemble the UNDERCLOTHES of earlier decades. These dresses were truly "revolutionary" - keeping in step with the political and social movements of the 1790s.  

 

Corset, panniers, and Chemise (ca. 1760-1770). 

 

However, these changes in women's fashions were as short lived. By the 1820s, simple shifts were again regulated to the role of underwear. Industrialization, the expanding wealth of the middle class, and the goading of fashion magazines created an elaborate culture of women's fashion. 

 

Corset, Chemise, and Draws ca. 1830

 


A Glimpse into the Future

The Rise of Corsets and Crinolines: Constructing the Nineteenth-Century Female Body

 

During the 1800s, woman's body was literally shaped by the clothing (and devices) she wore. Her clothing indicated her place in the social hierarchy as well as her mastery of current etiquette. During the nineteenth-century, the full skirts and constricted waists of the eighteenth-century court culture permeated the middle class.

 

Women's fashion was characterized by the CORSET, petticoat, and CRINOLINE.

 

  

This page shows the evolution of female silhouette throughout the nineteenth-century. Notice how little the fashion of men's clothing changes throughout the century. Does Austen's Lady Susan anticipate this shift in gender constructions (masculine = rational and functional vs. feminine = social object)?  

 

Day Dress, ca 1820 

Notice the expanding figure of female fashion - this dress requires a corset and petticoats. 

 

 

By the middle of the century women need a corset and hoop skirt to create the desired fashion. 

 

Day Dress, 1860.

 

CORSETS: 

 

Corsets were an ESSENTIAL part of a woman's attire. Some medical experts in the nineteenth-century claimed that the corset compensated for a woman's natural deficiencies (they claimed that a woman's spine was too weak to support her body, especially after puberty, and a corset was necessary to give her the support she needed to stand upright). 

 

How do advertisements like this position the women's fashion with power matrices? 

 

These corsets are a part of the fashion exhibit in the Victorian and Albert Museum in London.

 

Corsets were generally worn from the age of twelve, onwards. These restrictive devices could actually compress a woman's ribcage, causing permanent damage. However, women who did not wear corsets were immediately labeled "loose" women. Furthermore, the corset was thought to impose MORALITY upon the unruly (sexual) female body, curbing the appetites that resided in the torso and mid-section (See 
"Crinolines, Crinolettes, Bustles and Corsests from 1860-80").

 

This photograph from the 1890s features a woman who has tight-laced her corset to achieve what is referred to as a WASP WAIST. However, this extreme was the exception rather than the rule. 

 

HOOP SKIRTS AND CRINOLINES:

 


 

The hoop skirt came BACK into fashion in the 1850s (just after Jane Eyre was published - a novel you will read later). The hoop skirt, combined with the corset, emphasized a woman's ARTIFICIALLY TINY waist and accentuated her bust and hips (her figure - her sexuality). 

 

 

Evening Dress (ca 1860)

This evening dress utilizes a crinoline and a corset rather than a hoop.

 

 

Cage Crinoline (ça 1870)

Rigid hoop skirts were replaced by the more flexible crinoline cage in the later-decades of the nineteenth-century. 

 

The hoop skirt or crinoline, combined with the corset, forced women to (outwardly) conform to mid-nineteenth-century ideals of feminine passivity because these two devices effectually rendered women unable to engage in (meaningful) physical activity. 

  • Corsets restricted breathing, effectively stopping women from engaging in strenuous (or normal) physical activities.
    • A tight corset forced women to take shallow breaths (creating the sexually alluring "heaving bodice" effect)/
    • Wearing a corset for a prolonged period of time (since age twelve) forced the ribcage to conform to an UNNATURAL hour-glass form that could be life-threating, especially during childbirth.
    • Hoop skirts hampered any sort of movement, surrounding women in a (barely) mobile cage of wire, cloth, and crinoline. Even movement within the domestic sphere was very difficult (as the cartoon below states).
    • Hoop skirts and crinolines were more than a nuisance, they were a FIRE HAZARD. Some estimate that the second leading cause of death among women (in the West in the nineteenth century) was FIRE (burns). Cloth was ESPECIALLY flammable in this era and big skirts were FREQUENTLY catching fire. Even if women refrained from working in the kitchen (genteel British women were supposed to supervise the kitchen, not work in it), they were constantly surrounded by fire and their skirts were often ignited. Since women's clothing was DESIGNED to be difficult to remove, women could not get free of their burning clothes and they died (often in agony, days later).

 

 

This is a nineteenth century cartoon demonstrates that people were COGNIZANT of the annoyance (and irrationality) of fashions (just as we are aware of our own fashion hang-ups).   

 

 

This illustration shows a woman's crinoline catching on the door of a carriage. While the footman may be laughing at the spectacle, accidents like this could be hazardous (the woman could be caught and dragged behind the carriage, trampled in the busy London street...). 

 

 Reception Dress (ca. 1880)

 

This reception dress from the 1880s relies on a corset and bustle. Women's skirt widths steadily decrease after the middle of the century, but they still require artificial support.

 

Women's clothing in the nineteenth-century was supposed to serve as a middle-class STATUS symbol. The fashions that denoted the opulence of the aristocracy and upper-class in the 1700s permeated the ever-growing middle-class during the 1800s. Clothing that immobilized a woman demonstrated the wealth of her father or husband, indicating that she had servants and a lady's maid.

 

 

Fashions that had been associated with court culture in the eighteenth-century were associated with the nineteenth-century idealization of the middle-class domestic sphere. For example, the fashion plate below is from the Englishwoman's Domestic Magazine. Magazines throughout the nineteenth-century marketed the corse, hoop-skirt, and crinoline to middle-class women.      

 

 

Creating clothing in the domestic sphere:

This Lozier and Stokes sewing machine advertisement positions women's clothing and the creation of that clothing at the center of the domestic sphere. 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Finding More Material on Material Culture:

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.